Cost Action 18110 – Underground Built Heritage as catalyser for Community Valorisation

Bibliography

  • Admiraal, H & Narang S. (Eds) (2015), Think Deep: Planning, development and use of underground space in cities, ISOCARP
  • Applejuice Consultants (2008), Social impact of Heritage Lottery Funded projects. Evaluation report on research conducted for the Heritage Lottery Fund during 2006–2007;
  • Dargan, L. and Shucksmith, M. (2008) ‘LEADER and innovation’, Sociologia Ruralis vol.48 no. 3 pp. 274-291
  • Derkzen, P. and Boch, B. (2009) ‘Partnership and role perception, three case studies on the meaning of being a representative in rural partnerships’, Environment and Planning C vol. 27 pp. 75-89
  • EDORA, European Development Opportunities for Rural Areas (2011), Final Report, ESPON
  • Edwards, W.J et al. (2000) Partnership working in rural regeneration: governance and empowerment? Policy Press, Bristol.
  • Evans G and Shaw P (2004), The contribution of culture to regeneration in the UK: a review of evidence. London Metropolitan University, London
  • González S & Healey P (2005). A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Studies, 42(11).
  • Hodge, I & Midmore, P. (2008), ‘Models of Rural Development and Approaches To Analysis Evaluation And Decision-Making’, Économie rurale, 307
  • Juppenlatz, E. (2015), Rural Regeneration and Localism: A case study of Northumberland, PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle
  • Kemp R, Rotmans J (2005) ‘The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems’, Weber M, Hemmelskamp J (eds.) Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, Springer Verlag.
  • Labadi S (2008), Evaluating the socio-economic impacts of selected regenerated heritage sites in Europe, European Cultural Foundation, Amsterdam.
  • McCarthy J (2002), ‘Entertainment-led regeneration: The case of Detroit’, Cities, Vol 19, 2.
  • Parise M et al. (2013), ‘Classification of Artificial Cavities: A First Contribution by the UIS Commission’, in Filippi M., Bosák P. (Eds), 2013. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Speleology, July 21–28, Brno. Volume 2, Czech Speleological Society, Praha.
  • Paul T, Chow F, & Kjekstad O. (2002), Hidden Aspects of Urban Planning – Surface and Underground Development, Publ. Thomas Telford, London
  • Pretty, J. (1998), The Living Land. Agriculture, Food and Community Regeneration in Rural Europe, Earthscan, London
  • Rammel C et al. (2004), Governing Sustainable Development. A Co-evolutionary Perspective on Transitions and Change, GoSD working paper 1.
  • Roberts, P. (2003) ‘Partnerships, programmes and the promotion of regional development: an evaluation of the operation of the Structural Funds regional programmes’, Progress in Planning vol. 59 no. 1 pp. 1-69
  • Roberts P and Sykes H (2000), ‘Current challenges and future prospects’ in Roberts P and Sykes H (eds) Urban regeneration: a handbook. Sage publications, London
  • Rotmans, J & Loorbach D (2009). Complexity and transition management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2)
  • Scott, A. (2012) Partnerships: Pandora’s Box or panacea for rural development? Working Paper Series, no. 11, Birmingham University
    Shucksmith, M. (2000), Exclusive countryside? Social inclusion and regeneration in rural areas, Joseph Rowntree Foundation
  • Van der Ploeg et al. (2000), ‘Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory’, Sociologia Ruralis 40(4). Pp. 391-408
  • Van Huijstee, M.M. et al. (2007) ‘Partnerships for sustainable development: a review of current literature’, Environmental Sciences vol. 4 no. 2, pp. 75-89.
  • Van Tulder, R. et al. (2004), De Strategische Stakeholderdialoog. Opkomst, sussesfactoren en toekomst, Erasmus University